So the Presbyterian Church (USA) has changed their stance on
gay marriage and has now voted (with 76% voting for the change) to allow clergy
to perform same sex marriages wherever it is legal to do so…. and this
apparently is controversial?
Don’t get me wrong; I am a firm believer in the definition
of marriage being between one man and one woman. God will not be mocked and
this development is another sign of the growing apostasy within the PCUSA
denomination. The key word in that last sentence is “another”.
When I first learned of the news that this vote had
happened, I was surprised not at the fact that they voted in favor of gay
marriages, but that everyone else was surprised. Do we not know the long
history of the PCUSA’s practice of throwing out the gospel? And by long
history, I mean close to a century. 100 years. To demonstrate my reasoning
behind my lack of shock and awe at this, let’s go back in time and see why this
“news” is just another tasting of poison in an already terminally cancerous denomination.
In 1936 a man by the name of John Gresham Machen started the Orthodox
Presbyterian Church due to the growing acceptance of modernism within. By this
time, churches were rejecting the virgin birth, the resurrection of Jesus, the
miracles of Jesus etc. Nearly every essential doctrine of the church was being
rejected in favor of more social doctrines that were gaining popularity. Even
before then there was a clear rejecting of the gospel. In 1922 it was the First
Presbyterian Church (Manhattan), a PCUSA church, that allowed Harry Emerson
Fosdick to preach what was probably the most liberal sermon ever preached; the
aptly titled Shall the Fundamentalists Win? Indeed. The sermon is littered with
the familiar language of liberalism. “Tolerance” is the theme of the sermon.
Not the classical notion of tolerance, that of loving your neighbor despite
disagreement, but of adoption. The sermon argues thoroughly of constantly
updating the faith as it moves through time and taking a firm stance on the
actual teaching of the apostles is nothing less than intolerance. That was
1922.
Moving ahead, the denomination has not gotten any better. Last year
the church dropped In Christ Alone from their hymnals because the authors
refused to change the words “The wrath of God was satisfied” to “the love of
God was magnified”. The atonement is already an embarrassment to the church.
To further solidify how this new development isn’t really news, the
denomination has allowed the ordination of homosexuals since 2011. They ordained
their first gay minister, Scott Anderson, in October that same year. Anderson’s
own comments on CNN on the ordination are telling:
"I think what's happening in the Presbyterian church is happening also in the Christian church across our nation right now," Anderson told Malveaux. "Our church is recognizing there are a variety of viewpoints on scripture. There's no longer a right viewpoint and a wrong viewpoint but several faithful viewpoints, one of which includes me in terms of being a minister in the Presbyterian church. So we're honoring a diversity of viewpoints in our church."
"I think what's happening in the Presbyterian church is happening also in the Christian church across our nation right now," Anderson told Malveaux. "Our church is recognizing there are a variety of viewpoints on scripture. There's no longer a right viewpoint and a wrong viewpoint but several faithful viewpoints, one of which includes me in terms of being a minister in the Presbyterian church. So we're honoring a diversity of viewpoints in our church."
These are the words
of a minister, a leading member of the PCUSA denomination. It is clear, as if
it wasn’t back in 1922 and again 1936 that the PCUSA is not a church, as scripture
defines it, but a social petri dish where all social experiments are welcome
and may find their home and growth. So I must ask, why is this surprising? Is
it surprising that gospel-less church does heretical things? Is it surprising
that a worldly church behaves worldly?
It’s not that gay
marriage is not an important issue. It is. But it would be more shocking, more
dreadful, and more worrisome to see this kind of change in gospel centered
denominations. It would be a serious concern to see troubling signs and
slippery slopes in the PCA or the OPC, denominations that have a long history
of teaching and spreading the gospel. The PCUSA is the Mt. Saint Helens of
slippery slope activity (or perhaps, Krakatoa, destroying everything around it).
So it’s not particularly surprising or dreadful to see people kicking away at
the dirt of an already destroyed mountain. When you abandon the fundamentals of
the gospel, everything is fair game. Machen knew that, and it was just as bad
in his time. What we’re seeing now from the PCUSA, are the ripple effects of an
eruption that destroyed them long ago.
1 comment:
Nice post. You need to do a podcast of your posts, and then take callers :)
Post a Comment